BBC’s former Strictly Come Dancing professional, James Jordan, recently criticized the show’s judges for what he believes is a trend of overmarking contestants. Specifically, he singled out Craig Revel Horwood, Anton du Beke, Motsi Mabuse, and head judge Shirley Ballas for their scoring. Jordan took to Twitter to express his concerns, questioning whether the judges were trying to “save” a particular couple, Montell Douglas and Johannes Radebe.
During the latest episode of the show, both Douglas and JLS singer JB Gill received 35 points from the judges. Some viewers echoed Jordan’s sentiments, noting that the high scores this season seemed excessive and devalued the meaning of receiving a 9 or 10. Others pointed out that certain contestants, like Wynne and Katya and Pete and Jowita, have consistently been overmarked throughout the competition.
The episode concluded with EastEnders actor Jamie Borthwick’s lively jive routine with partner Michelle Tsiakkas, which featured a memorable entrance astride a giant ketchup bottle prop. Despite the entertainment value of the performances, the controversy surrounding the judges’ scoring has sparked debates among fans about the fairness and consistency of the scoring system on the show.
As the competition heats up and the stakes get higher, viewers will undoubtedly be keeping a close eye on the judges’ scoring decisions in the upcoming episodes. The criticism from former professionals like James Jordan adds an interesting layer of insight into the behind-the-scenes dynamics of the popular dance competition. Ultimately, the judges’ feedback and scores play a crucial role in determining the fate of the contestants, making it essential for them to maintain transparency and fairness in their evaluations.
